Difference between revisions of "Talk:Technical Data"
From Shin Megami Tensei IMAGINE Wiki
(→Summon Knowledge or Technique?) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Expertise]] lists [[Summon]] as a Technique, this page as a Knowledge. Not sure if the game treats them differently or if it's just a player made way of categorising expertise. Which is the correct classification? --[[User:AnnanFay|AnnanFay]] 09:43, 21 September 2012 (EDT) | [[Expertise]] lists [[Summon]] as a Technique, this page as a Knowledge. Not sure if the game treats them differently or if it's just a player made way of categorising expertise. Which is the correct classification? --[[User:AnnanFay|AnnanFay]] 09:43, 21 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
| − | <blockquote>It's a technique. Knowledges don't have active skills, only passive and switches. Also, this page is the only place I've ever seen that lists it as knowledge. [http://megatenonline.wiki.fc2.com/wiki/%E5%8F%AC%E5%96%9A Japanese wiki treats it as conversation skill], which is a branch of techniques. --[[User:Glorienn|Glorienn]] 15:40, 22 September 2012 (EDT) | + | <blockquote>It's a technique. Knowledges don't have active skills, only passive and switches. Also, this page is the only place I've ever seen that lists it as knowledge. [http://megatenonline.wiki.fc2.com/wiki/%E5%8F%AC%E5%96%9A Japanese wiki treats it as conversation skill], which is a branch of techniques. --[[User:Glorienn|Glorienn]] 15:40, 22 September 2012 (EDT)</blockquote> |
| + | |||
| + | == Formula Rounding? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Are the stat formula rounded up, down or normally? --[[User:AnnanFay|AnnanFay]] 04:56, 7 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | <blockquote>Pretty sure it rounds down. --[[User:Glorienn|Glorienn]] 08:07, 9 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:07, 9 October 2012
[edit] Summon Knowledge or Technique?
Expertise lists Summon as a Technique, this page as a Knowledge. Not sure if the game treats them differently or if it's just a player made way of categorising expertise. Which is the correct classification? --AnnanFay 09:43, 21 September 2012 (EDT)
It's a technique. Knowledges don't have active skills, only passive and switches. Also, this page is the only place I've ever seen that lists it as knowledge. Japanese wiki treats it as conversation skill, which is a branch of techniques. --Glorienn 15:40, 22 September 2012 (EDT)
[edit] Formula Rounding?
Are the stat formula rounded up, down or normally? --AnnanFay 04:56, 7 October 2012 (EDT)
Pretty sure it rounds down. --Glorienn 08:07, 9 October 2012 (EDT)
